A scientific riddle…

It is often claimed that theological and metaphysical claims must be based upon, or somehow verified by, other sources of knowledge, especially the results of the scientiic method. However, I wonder if the problem does not cut both ways. If a, so to speak, monochromatic epistemological basis for some claims C undercuts the truth of C, then even scientific claims S would require a polychromatic epistemological basis. If C’s own methodology cannot substantiate C, can S’s methodology substantiate S? Is there any possible evidence for scientific claims that is not itself based on the scientific method? Is there evidence for a scientific claim S that is not itself derived from antecedent scientific claims S’? Is there a (non-circular) way to establish scientific claims without resorting to the methodology which is supposed to be validated by the very claims in question?


About The Codgitator (a cadgertator)

Catholic convert. Quasi-Zorbatic. Freelance interpreter, translator, and web marketer. Former ESL teacher in Taiwan (2003-2012) and former public high school teacher (2012-2014). Married father of three. Multilingual, would-be scholar, and fairly consistent fitness monkey. My research interests include: the interface of religion and science, the history and philosophy of science and technology, ancient and medieval philosophy, and cognitive neuroscience. Please pray for me.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Be kind, be (relatively) brief, be clear...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s