Ecumenism for Sneetches…

“Even people who can be considered dubious on account of their errors have something to offer which must not be overlooked. It is the convergence of peoples who, within the universal order, maintain their own individuality; it is the sum total of persons within a society which pursues the common good, which truly has a place for everyone.”EG §236

I think this:

Ecumenism — A Catholic Blind Spot (National Catholic Register, 22 Dec. 2013)

When Pope Francis stretches out his hand to minister to the sick, does he first ask, “Are you Catholic?” Probably not, because to live the gospel is to extend Christ’s love universally and without qualification. His Holiness practices daily ecumenism because his focus is on people’s gifts and needs, not categories of acceptability.

–is a perfect ballast of irony to this:

CDF prefect says SSPX in schism, suspended from sacraments (Catholic Culture, 23 Dec. 2013)

In an interview with the Italian daily Corriere della Sera, Archbishop Gerhard Müller said that although Pope Benedict XVI lifted the canonical excommunication of SSPX prelates, they remain suspended from the sacraments because “by their schism they have broken away from communion with the Church.”


Presumably Jews, Protestants, and atheists, to name only three categories, do not understand what their rejection of communion with the Holy See means, and are therefore “off the hook”–while the SSPX is held to a different standard. Along similar lines I was struck this morning by the irony those often most willing to answer, “Probably,” to Balthasar’s question, “Dare we hope that all men shall be saved?” may be just as likely to answer, “Obviously not,” if the question is modified to, “Dare we hope that Abp. Lefebvre is saved?” I am not defending the SSPX, by the way; I am simply urging some parsimony in the mania for ecumenism.

P1020115In any event, this is another instance of Pope “Who am I to judge?” Francis delegating his heavy lifting–his dirty work–to the same Curia (or at least, as on the divorce debate, to Abp. Müller) which he recently said should not be so intent on “inspecting and questioning.” Such delegation is par for the papal course, I’m sure, but it should be noted that even as the edges harden around Pope Francis’s papacy (his suppression of the FFI, his leftward reshuffling of the Congregation for Bishops, etc.), he is still praised as the Nice-Guy, Soft-Touch, Hope-and-Change Pope. As I have noted before, there is a selective invocation of many of Pope Francis’s pastoral oracles, and it’s largely biased against traditionally orthodox Catholics.


About The Codgitator (a cadgertator)

Catholic convert. Quasi-Zorbatic. Freelance interpreter, translator, and web marketer. Former ESL teacher in Taiwan (2003-2012) and former public high school teacher (2012-2014). Married father of three. Multilingual, would-be scholar, and fairly consistent fitness monkey. My research interests include: the interface of religion and science, the history and philosophy of science and technology, ancient and medieval philosophy, and cognitive neuroscience. Please pray for me.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Ecumenism for Sneetches…

  1. Brock Fowler says:

    He is the most insulting Pope since….?

    Unless, of course, you are an atheist, member of another religion, or Protestant.

  2. IbnYaqob says:

    Jews, Muslims and Protestants don’t accept the First Vatican Council or it’s teaching. In Theory the SSPX does especially those parts about the Pope having supreme authority over pastoral discipline. Also those parts about it being necessary for salvation to submit to his authority.
    How can they plead invincible ignorance.

    In a generation the SSPX will just be another schismatic Church like the Eastern Orthodox only with a more western theme. Their followers at that point might be able to plead invincible ignorance.

    I don’t see how the current crop or their sympathizers can?

    Merry Christmas Wannabes.

  3. Pingback: What a Christmas gift! | FideCogitActio : "Omnis per gratiam"

  4. Brock Fowler says:

    That certainly would seem like a reasonable assumption, but so far it has turned out that it is the main Church that drifts further and further, while SSPX stays the same.

    We’ll see about the future…

  5. Mary says:

    Can someone please answer for me…and with Church documentation if possible…how so many can claim that even though the SSPX have been suspended from the sacraments that their sacraments are still valid. That makes no sense to me. Thank you.

Be kind, be (relatively) brief, be clear...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s