A note on method…

laptops kids readingIt seems that my codgitations have attracted new readers in the past month, so I want to clarify a thing or two that only long-time readers of FCA would understand about me as a blogger.

i) Since a number of my writings require a lot of time and thought, I cannot always guarantee a quick, much less consistent, posting rate. ii) I tend to get fixated on one or two topics, which I explore from numerous angles until my codgitator is sated, and then move onto something else (often only to return to that earlier groove). Sometimes that something else is nothing at all. I have seasons of blogging, not according to a fixed schedule, but as my life and intellect allow. If you couldn’t tell, I’m in an especially fixated and especially prodigious season these days.

iii) While I am trying to keep up with the several, sometimes hourly, codgitations that sprout during a “heavy” season like this, I have not lost sight of other ideas or issues that I want to address. Even if it seems to take forever, as befits a Catholic Ent, I almost always get around to addressing what I deem worthy rebuttals, contributions and questions. I know there are some readers who consider it scorchingly urgent that I address one or two pet issues, so let me lay out what to expect in the coming weeks and months. Except for the first item, even though I use sequential conjunctions, there’s no particular temporal order in which I’d like to post these things.

 • Above all I want to get part 3 of “The Battle Within” finished. I know I keep saying that, but it’s true and I’ll explain the delay in a minute.

• I want to address what Crude proposed on 24-25 October:

I have a request for you to possibly take up sometime: tell me what you’d LIKE the Pope to say. Not just broad affirmations like, ‘Well, I’d like him to decisively condemn (x) or say that (y) is true’. Tell me how he should say it, how he should do it. Write a paragraph you’d like Francis to say, and why you’d welcome it being put that way. … Assume you’re the Pope. Your goal is to try and communicate these ideas to people:

* Having same sex attraction is not in and of itself a sin – it’s the sexual acts that are. Thus, gays and lesbians have a place in the church, but but sodomy is still a sin, and gay marriage is still illegitimate/immoral.

* An atheist, despite not believing in God, can still nevertheless do good – and if they really believe that there is ‘good’ to do, they should continue to seek both to do it and understand it.

• I want to address, briefly, Brendan and Michael’s comments about the language of encounter versus the language of doctrine.

• I want to organize and deepen my comments from another blog for a critique of a key defect in the Pope’s teaching on conscience, as it may be the only point on which I can say with certitude that he’s wrong and must retract the statement as a heretical claim. Hopefully that will dispel the frothy gnashing of so many shadows behind the curtains of FCA.

[I added this item a day later…] I want to share with you some interesting data I’ve found in connection with the Pope’s recent Rock-Candy-Jesus Resurrexifix fandango.

 I may respond to some comments made about my post about prayer and the Rosary, and I have a post I drafted almost immediately in response to a question that Malcolm asked weeks ago.

• There are some other kibbles and bits in the draft cooler that I hope to kick into shape, but for the most part, unless I get T-boned by some new codgitative obsession, that, me droogie woogies, is the FCA forecast.


unnecessary words sound smart betterhalfAs hard as it for me to let go of the reins and break the blogger’s compulsive lifestyle, one step I think I must take is to step back from basically all ecclesial current events, read my F1 F/X Files from the top, and see what themes or facts survive the codgitative trial by fire. It stuns me sometimes when I pick back through previous posts, trying to find a link or a phrase, how much I’ve written in the past 4-6 weeks! This plenitude partially explains why I’ve hit a wall with part 3 of “The Battle Within,” namely, not only do I feel like I’ve lost the thread to some extent, but also a number of my theses in part 3 have either leaked out in other posts of mine of late or been articulated by other writers (Dale Price being a prime example). It’s funny, because if I were obsessed with branding my ideas or cornering the marketing on a certain style of blogging, I would never link to others and would probably just post my rough drafts as quickly as possible in order to win the “firsties” war.

Finally, a point about style and character. I am a wordsmith and language guy, but, while I loathe the word “meme”, I’ve always enjoyed layering images into my blog posts. A picture is worth a thousand words, and I’m already verbose enough, so, while it may come across as snarky or distracting to some, I’m going to have to stand up for my pictorial style of verbosity. I’m a reading teacher and if most textbooks lack one thing, it’s enough images.

As for my character, I am not unwilling to revise posts, or even retract them, in the face of substantial rejoinders or corrections. I played sports throughout high school, so I’d like to think I’m “coachable.” I’m far less educated than I might appear, but I am always willing to learn. Once in high school, somebody told me, “You’re really smart,” but I reflexively replied, “No, I just work harder than most of my classmates.” I went to a good school, and I had some truly brilliant classmates. I knew I wasn’t as “smart” as they were, but I also knew I was more willing to put in the time to learn. I try to maintain this disposition even as an adult. For example, a commenter recently corrected the Latin I had posted in FCA’s title box, and I have amended it accordingly. Like I say, I do not want this blog to be my private little echo chamber, and I’m not afraid of being challenged or corrected, though I have minimal tolerance for excessive trolling and ad hominem sniping. On the other hand, I’m quite content not having the most boisterous, popular blog een ze entiyah verld! My content and my style are not for everybody. You have to be a bit of an egghead to stick with FCA, and eggheadery is never a popular scene. I love to learn and share my learning, and that’s what this blog is all about.

monkey typingSo, the best thing I can give you right now is–patience. At the end of the day, as far as the blogosphere is concerned, I’m just “some guy with a keyboard”. I’d like to think that my sacramental life, my family, my health and my job were more important than my blog, but sometimes, to go by my output, you’d have to wonder. 😉


About The Codgitator (a cadgertator)

Catholic convert. Quasi-Zorbatic. Freelance interpreter, translator, and web marketer. Former ESL teacher in Taiwan (2003-2012) and former public high school teacher (2012-2014). Married father of three. Multilingual, would-be scholar, and fairly consistent fitness monkey. My research interests include: the interface of religion and science, the history and philosophy of science and technology, ancient and medieval philosophy, and cognitive neuroscience. Please pray for me.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to A note on method…

  1. graywills says:

    Well I for one love your blogs, your thoughts ( even though I may not always agree with them ) and your sometimes fabulous sense of humour. At the end of the day we all have to love each and get along with each other, else the planet and humankind along with it is doomed.
    Everlasting love and peace in Jesus Christ dear brother.

  2. graywills says:

    I often sing along a wee ditty YMCA – Yo Fide Cogit Actio – to the tune of the Village People’s YMCA. Works for me! Blessings.

  3. BEE-RILL-YANT! Love it. Boosts my spirit. Thank you!

  4. I ne’er expect to have all men agree with me. I only desire that all men love God above all else. If I can inject some humor along the, way, all the better. You truly are my brother, brother.

  5. Juan Herena says:

    I for one look forward to reading your posts even when I may not agree with you on all points. The needs of the soul, the body, and the family easily precede those of an online audience. Thanks for your worthy cogitations! Vale!

  6. Codg, I’d love to see you respond to Fr. Gordon McCrae. He’s, if you don’t know already, a Priest accused of sexual abuse falsely and is still in jail. Obviously I don’t KNOW if he’s innocent, but given the information we have on him I think the odds are VERY high, to the point where I assume innocence – the evidence against him is really, really terrible.

    Anyway, with that out of the way, he is a Francis “fan” and seems to think of him in many ways as I think of him – if anything, he’s even more “with” the Pope than I am. He has a couple of articles out on Pope Francis, and his last one is very directly related to everything you’ve been saying and particularly strongly worded – you really should take a look.

    Keep in mind, Fr. McCrae is VERY orthodox. He is in no way a liberal. I’m genuinely interested to see your response. BTW, read the blog anyway, he’s a terrific writer.


  7. Gian says:

    Having a homoerotic attraction may be sinless but perhaps entertaining the said attraction may be not without sin?
    Shouldn’t the disordered inclinations be killed like the babes of Babylon?
    So, the thing is not just inclination-act dichotomy, but inclination-entertaining-act. Of course, in a way, entertaining a desire is itself an act. Only not a visible act.

  8. graywills says:

    And, it has been proven time and again, the witches of Salam are alive and … well I was going to say well, but sadly, very sadly, that is not the case.

  9. Come again? I don’t understand your reply to malcolm.

  10. Pingback: God is Catholic or the Catholic Church is not divine… | FideCogitActio : "Omnis per gratiam," etiam sub patrocinio S. Ignatii Loyolae et Francisci Salesii. C.S.S.M.L. + N.D.S.M.D. + V.R.S. N.S.M.V. S.M.Q.L. I.V.B.

  11. Pingback: An evil god is the least of your worries… | FideCogitActio : "Omnis per gratiam"

  12. Pingback: I’m not dead yet… | FideCogitActio : "Omnis per gratiam"

  13. Pingback: Password-protected posts? At this hour? | FideCogitActio : "Omnis per gratiam" fidescogitactio @ gmail . com

  14. Pingback: New Policy Day! | FideCogitActio : "Omnis per gratiam" fidescogitactio @ gmail . com

Be kind, be (relatively) brief, be clear...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s